News

Why has the latest Apple Watch been removed from sale?

Following the discovery of patent rights violations, Apple will cease the sale of its latest watches in the US. An order preventing the sales and imports of watches featuring the disputed blood oxygen function is set to be enforced on December 26. 

Despite Apple’s intention to appeal the decision, it has chosen to proactively remove the devices from its US website on December 21 and from stores in the country post-Christmas Eve. Sales in other regions remain unaffected.

Apple expressed strong disagreement with the order and said that it is committed to exploring legal and technical avenues to ensure the availability of the Apple Watch to customers. 

The dispute originated from conflicts with California-based medical device companies Masimo and its spin-off, Cercacor. These companies accused Apple of recruiting key personnel and employing other tactics to misappropriate technology for measuring blood oxygen levels.

Most editions of Apple’s smartwatches, including the Series 9 and Ultra 2, have included the disputed feature since 2020, with the SE model being an exception. 

In October, the US International Trade Commission concurred that Apple had infringed on certain patent rights, issuing an order to prohibit specific imports.

Masimo’s CEO, Joe Kiani, emphasized the order’s significance, asserting that it conveyed a powerful message about accountability even for the world’s largest company.

The International Trade Commission’s order is subject to a 60-day review by the president, concluding on December 25, with the possibility of a veto. 

While presidential intervention doesn’t happen that often, it has occurred in the past. For example, former President Obama intervened on Apple’s behalf in a separate dispute in 2013. 

Apple plans to challenge the International Trade Court’s decision and seek a suspension of the order during the appeal process.

This legal battle is part of an ongoing conflict between Apple and Masimo concerning oxygen technology, with Apple filing its own patent infringement claims against Masimo. A jury trial on Masimo’s theft allegations resulted in a mistrial earlier in the year. 

Linda Conrad

Recent Posts

American Investment Consortium Emerges as TikTok’s Potential New Operators

  A coalition of American venture capital firms, private equity funds, and technology companies has…

3 days ago

Apple Reaches New Price Peak with $2,000 Smartphone Option

  Apple has shattered smartphone pricing barriers with its latest iPhone 17 Pro Max, offering…

3 days ago

Universal COVID-19 Vaccination Could Prevent Thousands of Additional Deaths, Study Reveals

  New research analysis emphasizes significant advantages of maintaining universal COVID-19 vaccination recommendations as health…

1 week ago

Armored Units Encircle Palestinian Urban Center as Trade Penalties Advance

  Canadian authorities have prohibited Belfast-based rap trio Kneecap from entering the country before their…

1 week ago

Beijing Accuses Leading AI Chipmaker of Monopoly Violations Amid Trade Dispute

  Chinese authorities dramatically intensified their trade confrontation with Washington on Monday by alleging that…

1 week ago

Bucharest Denounces Moscow Over Airspace Violation During Ukraine Strike

  Romanian authorities have strongly criticized Moscow following an alleged unauthorized entry of a Russian…

1 week ago