News

Why has the latest Apple Watch been removed from sale?

Following the discovery of patent rights violations, Apple will cease the sale of its latest watches in the US. An order preventing the sales and imports of watches featuring the disputed blood oxygen function is set to be enforced on December 26. 

Despite Apple’s intention to appeal the decision, it has chosen to proactively remove the devices from its US website on December 21 and from stores in the country post-Christmas Eve. Sales in other regions remain unaffected.

Apple expressed strong disagreement with the order and said that it is committed to exploring legal and technical avenues to ensure the availability of the Apple Watch to customers. 

The dispute originated from conflicts with California-based medical device companies Masimo and its spin-off, Cercacor. These companies accused Apple of recruiting key personnel and employing other tactics to misappropriate technology for measuring blood oxygen levels.

Most editions of Apple’s smartwatches, including the Series 9 and Ultra 2, have included the disputed feature since 2020, with the SE model being an exception. 

In October, the US International Trade Commission concurred that Apple had infringed on certain patent rights, issuing an order to prohibit specific imports.

Masimo’s CEO, Joe Kiani, emphasized the order’s significance, asserting that it conveyed a powerful message about accountability even for the world’s largest company.

The International Trade Commission’s order is subject to a 60-day review by the president, concluding on December 25, with the possibility of a veto. 

While presidential intervention doesn’t happen that often, it has occurred in the past. For example, former President Obama intervened on Apple’s behalf in a separate dispute in 2013. 

Apple plans to challenge the International Trade Court’s decision and seek a suspension of the order during the appeal process.

This legal battle is part of an ongoing conflict between Apple and Masimo concerning oxygen technology, with Apple filing its own patent infringement claims against Masimo. A jury trial on Masimo’s theft allegations resulted in a mistrial earlier in the year. 

Linda Conrad

Recent Posts

Why Halloween Candy Is Getting Pricier — and Less Chocolatey

  Halloween candy lovers may notice something different this year — higher prices, smaller portions,…

1 week ago

Microsoft’s AI Chief: Building an AI You Can Trust Your Kids To Use

  Artificial intelligence is evolving rapidly, reshaping how people interact with technology — and even…

1 week ago

What Got More Expensive in September

  September’s Consumer Price Index report revealed that while inflation pressures remain uneven, some key…

1 week ago

mRNA COVID Vaccines Show Promise in Boosting Cancer Treatment Success

Widely administered COVID-19 vaccines may deliver an unexpected advantage for certain cancer patients by enhancing…

2 weeks ago

Samsung Unveils Mixed Reality Headset to Challenge Apple’s Dominance

  Digital mapping services already enable virtual exploration of distant locations from the comfort of…

2 weeks ago

Why the Fed Can’t Rescue Struggling Young Tech Workers

Thousands of young Americans armed with computer science degrees are finding it increasingly difficult to…

2 weeks ago