Washington Escalates Tech Restrictions on Chinese Companies, Triggering Beijing’s Fury
The Trump Administration intensified its campaign against Chinese technology companies this week by broadening existing sanctions to encompass their subsidiary operations. This strategic expansion has provoked sharp criticism from Beijing as both nations continue their high-stakes competition for technological supremacy.
The expanded regulations target prominent Chinese firms including telecommunications leader Huawei, memory chip manufacturer YMTC, and drone producer DJI. Washington’s objective is preventing these sanctioned entities from circumventing export limitations by routing prohibited technologies through subsidiary channels.
Closing the Loophole: New Rules Target Subsidiary Networks
According to the US Department of Commerce, this regulatory update addresses a critical vulnerability in enforcement. Under the revised framework, any subsidiary with at least 50% ownership by a firm already subject to export controls will face identical restrictions as its parent organization. Industry analysts suggest this modification could impact thousands of corporate entities.
China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a forceful rebuke, characterizing the American action as “extremely malicious.” A ministry representative announced Beijing’s intention to implement “necessary measures” safeguarding Chinese corporate interests. The spokesperson demanded Washington reverse course and cease what China views as unjustified targeting of its business sector.
These enhanced restrictions represent Washington’s latest effort to strengthen oversight of more than one thousand Chinese companies identified as potential threats to American national security or foreign policy objectives. Organizations appearing on this roster must secure special authorization before exporting specific products or technologies.
The prohibited items span critical emerging sectors including artificial intelligence, semiconductor manufacturing, advanced robotics, and related production equipment. The updated regulations additionally apply to entries on the “Military End-User list,” designed to prevent civilian goods from being redirected toward military applications.
This development introduces additional complications to the already contentious US-China trade relationship, arriving mere weeks before President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping are anticipated to convene during the APEC summit in South Korea.
Pattern of Evasion: Why Experts Welcomed the Change
Although the policy adjustment doesn’t explicitly name China, Chinese and Russian organizations comprise the majority of the entity list, primarily due to concerns about supporting military technological development. Washington has grown increasingly alarmed by China’s accelerated advancement in chip manufacturing and artificial intelligence capabilities, leading to Huawei’s inclusion on the blacklist in 2019, followed by hundreds of additional companies.
Jeffrey I. Kessler, Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security, stated that regulatory gaps have too long permitted exports compromising American national security and foreign policy priorities.
Policy experts and governmental advisors have repeatedly highlighted risks of sanctioned companies leveraging subsidiaries or affiliated entities to evade restrictions. A 2023 US House Foreign Affairs Committee assessment criticized the entity list implementation as “ineffective,” advocating for reformed approaches similar to this week’s announcement.
The committee’s findings cited Huawei’s 2020 sale of its Honor smartphone division to a buyer group including Chinese government entities, occurring after Huawei’s blacklisting. Honor itself has never faced sanctions. Congressional investigators identified this transaction as illustrating how Chinese corporations potentially “restructure themselves” to bypass American export and investment limitations.
Documentation released alongside the announcement indicated that export control authorities recognized how previous methodologies enabled evasion tactics, including establishing new foreign entities specifically to circumvent entity list restrictions.
The subsidiary coverage expansion became effective immediately, though certain companies received 60-day temporary exemptions, according to the Commerce Department’s statement.
