Trump Turns Down a Deal to End the DHS Shutdown and Demands the SAVE Act Instead

 

A potential path out of the Department of Homeland Security shutdown was placed in front of President Donald Trump on Sunday. He looked at it, rejected it, and took to social media to attack Democrats instead. The standoff that has left TSA workers unpaid for more than a month and produced chaos at airport security checkpoints across the country is now tied to a separate piece of legislation that has little to do with keeping the government funded.

The proposal presented to Trump offered a pragmatic middle ground: restore funding to every part of the Department of Homeland Security with the single exception of Immigration and Customs Enforcement enforcement operations. Senate Majority Leader John Thune discussed the idea with Trump directly after staff walked him through it. The president rejected it outright.

In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump declared he would not negotiate with Democrats unless and until they agreed to vote for the SAVE America Act, a sweeping federal elections overhaul bill that currently lacks the Senate support needed to pass under normal legislative rules. He described the bill as more important than any other Senate business, including resolving the shutdown that has pushed airport security lines to breaking point across the country.

A Shutdown That Was Already Complicated Just Got More So

The rejection landed as a surprise, partly because the proposal Trump turned down represented a significant shift from the position Republicans had been defending for weeks. The party had previously blocked identical ideas put forward by Democrats. That the same concept was now being floated internally, with Republican backing, reflected growing anxiety within the party about the political consequences of prolonged airport disruption.

Texas Senator Ted Cruz, whose constituents have faced some of the worst TSA delays in the country, has been among those pushing for a resolution. The security lines are no longer an abstract policy problem but a visible, daily inconvenience experienced by millions of ordinary travelers, and patience within the GOP is wearing thin.

Democrats, for their part, have maintained throughout that they are willing to fund the entirety of the department with the exception of ICE operations, and see that position as a reasonable starting point for negotiation. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer accused Trump of actively sabotaging talks by attaching the SAVE Act demand to a funding dispute that has nothing to do with election law.

Thune himself pushed back carefully but clearly on Trump’s framing. He acknowledged broad Republican agreement with the substance of the SAVE America Act but was direct in stating that demanding its passage as a condition for reopening the government was not a realistic position. The bill does not have the 60 votes required to overcome a filibuster, and there is no current appetite within the Republican conference to change that rule.

Negotiations Stall as Confirmation Adds Another Layer

Behind the scenes, the pace of talks had already been slowing before Trump’s Sunday intervention. Multiple meetings between lawmakers and White House border official Tom Homan had produced limited concrete progress, though Democrats reported some encouraging movement on specific issues including body camera funding, enforcement standards, and protections around sensitive locations like hospitals, schools, and churches.

That fragile momentum appeared to stall further when Democrats were informed that Homan was unavailable for a scheduled meeting. The White House explained the pause by pointing to the imminent Senate confirmation of Oklahoma Senator Markwayne Mullin as the new DHS secretary, saying it preferred to wait until Mullin was confirmed before resuming substantive negotiations.

With an already complicated shutdown now entangled in a separate legislative battle, and both sides pointing fingers over who is responsible for the delay, a resolution before the end of the week looks increasingly unlikely.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *